One of the great things about being ignorant is that I often think my ideas are original. It’s a wonderful feeling. That’s why I try to avoid any knowledge that would spoil the sensation. Sometimes it isn’t easy. People keep hurling knowledge at me, and I can’t always duck.
For example, people often accuse me of ripping off the great philosopher Spinoza when I write about the universe being God, or when I say people obviously have no free will. I act like I know what they are talking about and quickly change the subject. In reality, I didn’t know Spinoza from Shinola.
Einstein has famously said he believes in Spinoza’s version of God. I always wondered why he invoked Spinoza. It was time to find out about this Spinoza dude. I’m far too lazy to read an entire book, so I went to Wikipedia and read what strangers with no credibility had to say about him.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baruch_Spinoza
Holy cow! My opinions match Spinoza’s perfectly. It turns out that being ignorant is almost exactly like being a well-read student of philosophy who can quote from the work of the masters. How lucky is that?
Now I know why Einstein invoked Spinoza when talking about his beliefs. Einstein discovered more than the theory of relativity. He also found a way to act like he believed in God, so all the God-lovers would accept him as their own, while simultaneously saying God is nothing more than semantics, so atheists would embrace him too. And he blamed it all on a dead guy, Spinoza. How many ways does Einstein need to keep proving he’s a genius? I mean seriously, this is just showing off.
I have decided to adopt Einstein’s weasel-genius view of God so everyone thinks I’m on their side. That could come in handy when I run for President. For the record, I believe in Spinoza’s God. Less than one percent of Americans will know what that means. The other 99% will think I believe God is a bearded guy who hands out harps in the afterlife. They will love me for being on their side.
I think Spinoza would be proud to know that his life’s work boiled down to creating a God for weasels.
Hi people
Here my free audiobooks links collection
[url=http://audiobooks.128bit.at]audiobooks.128bit.at[/url]
Good collection of sites with free audio and ebooks.
Some free audiobooks from this site:
[i]-Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (Book 5) Playtime : 360 Minutes Bitrate: 56 kbps[/i]
[i]-Benjamin Franklin: An American Life Playtime : 236 Minutes Bitrate: 56 kbps[/i]
[i]-4th Of July (Women's Murder Club) Playtime : 281 Minutes Bitrate: 56 kbps[/i]
[i]-A Short History of Nearly Everything Playtime : 305 Minutes Bitrate: 56 kbps[/i]
BookCrossing
is a . . . well, it is a book-lovers site. Have you caught one? Did you release one?
If books were animals, this would be the International Zoological Society.
Posted by: DolceMartinez | November 14, 2007 at 08:41 PM
"I will not vote for Scott Adams if he runs for President! Actually, I plan on never voting for a President. Some thing about living in a constitutional monarchy."
- Hanneth
What?! Have you any idea of how many people died for your right to vote? Do you hate democracy? Do you hate your country? Nazi!
Give me one good reason not to vote!
Posted by: Simon | October 04, 2007 at 06:55 AM
Could someone illuminate me as to the difference between random and free? If you think about the cconcept of free wil it necessarily involves a contradiction... unless the freedom of will is the product of randomness. As far as i am concerned the 'will' that is free is a product of interactions between chaotic and indeterminate particles. This is Free Will.
Posted by: C. | May 21, 2007 at 04:44 PM
I love this line:
"I’m far too lazy to read an entire book, so I went to Wikipedia and read what strangers with no credibility had to say about him"
I do the same all time, whatever the subject, and it works marvels.
God bless Spinoza.
God bless the Wikipedia.
Posted by: Listo Entertainment | May 08, 2007 at 09:09 AM
"I can only come to the conclusion that we don't have free will, but I'm perplexed why others can't see it the same way. "
Hilarious. If it wasn't so long, it would be a good bumper sticker. To bad the poster seems to be serious.
Posted by: Joe | May 06, 2007 at 11:52 AM
Ahh... the sweet, sweet, cognitive dissonance a self-proclaimied genius/atheist feels when told that Einstein believed in God. It smells great in the morning.
Posted by: Jim | May 05, 2007 at 04:05 PM
WMD May refer to "W's Missing Doughnuts"
http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/WMD_%28Donuts%29
yeah I know this is totally OT, but that sounded more interesting than arguments against string theory.
Posted by: Bytesage | May 05, 2007 at 12:21 PM
i live about 800m from a house where Spinoza lived for a few years. apparently he was really small because the doorways are approx. 2/3rd the height of normal, modern doorways. short people got no reason to live. so there.
Posted by: William Beekhuis | May 05, 2007 at 07:59 AM
If our universe is ever-expanding, even if it has boundaries at a given moment of time, isn't it still infinite overall? I'd call it countably infinite.
Posted by: synapticmisfires | May 05, 2007 at 07:49 AM
brilliant idiot
Posted by: Adrian Major | May 05, 2007 at 04:58 AM
String theory??? It should have been called String shot-in-the-dark-from-mathematical-left-field. I'd say it sounds like this blessed de Spinoza guy invalidates string theory, not the other way around. Way to burst my bubble-universe. Wait, wait...maybe the little spaghetti-strings were the god/infinite substance that Einstein was talking about. Someone update Einstein on wikuhpedia...clearly he discovered strings as well as gravity waves and special relativity.
By the way, I am really disappointed in this post. When I went to click on the link, I thought for sure that it would be about Dogbert-worshipping Mustelidae.
Posted by: do I have to? | May 04, 2007 at 10:03 PM
To those that say there are 2 Asoks in the comic strip, I think we should name the second character Askott.
bb
Posted by: Bulbboy | May 04, 2007 at 08:09 AM
So you're saying when Einstein said "God does not play dice with the universe," he was actually saying "God doesn't play with himself"?
Posted by: BrYaN | May 04, 2007 at 07:09 AM
Long live the Flying Spaghetti Monster
Posted by: Bloggins | May 04, 2007 at 06:43 AM
Scott,
This belief, I believe, makes you a Deist. Basically, the idea is that whatever it is that set the universe in motion -- that is God. And if you feel the desire to know God and appreciate it, the only way we have to do so is by studying and appreciating its creations -- the world and its inhabitants.
A similar world view -- if you simly ignore the questions of "Who is God?" and, "What is God?", is Humanism.
Those questions, of course, are immaterial to the Deist or the Humanist, in that they are irrelevant to the questions of how one should live one's life.
Interesting topic of discussion.
Eric E. Haas
Posted by: Eric E. Haas | May 04, 2007 at 06:17 AM
Have you read this book from Richard Dawkins called "God Delusion"?
In the book Prof. Dawkins brings out:
But Einstein also said, "It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it
is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it."
[Source: Max Jammer's book Einstein and Religion]
Further:
Einstein said, 'If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed.' [I guess a Twist to the word God-fearing!]
I have made a note from the book and put it on http://randomthoughtsofani.blogspot.com/2007/04/notes-from-delusion-by-richard-dawkins.html .
Posted by: Animesh Sharma | May 04, 2007 at 04:21 AM
Bobby said:
I.e. knew the mass and velocity and the forces acting on every particle in the universe could you predict the future? And lets say you built a machine that took this information and could tell you, at the press of a button, an event that will take place at some time in the future,
I believe such a machine cannot exist. My theory is that the universe itself is the most efficient encoding of all the information in the universe, therefore any machine that encoded all this information would have to be bigger than, and separate from, the universe. Which is impossible. It is impossible to know all the information, so it is impossible to predict the future with perfect accuracy, even if the future is predetermined.
And that doesn't even invoke the uncertainty principle, which implies that it is impossible to know the future of even a single electron, let alone the whole universe...
Posted by: Tony | May 04, 2007 at 03:27 AM
Nothing to do with Spinoza, but according to the UK Times, the goat that got married to a guy who was found having sex with it has died - as a result of choking to death on a plastic bag. it sound suspicious to me......
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/africa/article1744570.ece
Posted by: ShirtBloke | May 04, 2007 at 03:18 AM
So, according to you, Scott Adams, Einstein and the Sphinx person all have the same level of thinking and should be treated in the same way??
Posted by: Venky | May 04, 2007 at 02:38 AM
But why does your head keep changing size in your comic strips? And why is it usually so much smaller than the other characters?
Posted by: Carlbert | May 04, 2007 at 02:03 AM
What are those self portraits these last couple of days telling us about your self image?
-The big head,
-Very tidy outfit,
-painstakingly drawn hair,
-good posture,
-tiny mouth when not speaking but perfect circle and big when talking,
-bigger asymmetric ears when being spoken to by someone not he PHB,
-little arm clench at the punch line.
Now, I’m not qualified to comment on such things so my opinion counts more than the next man’s, and I say this; you have a big head, funny ears, elastic features and you spend too much time whipping the person who does your ironing. Go on, deny it!
Posted by: Andrew | May 04, 2007 at 02:01 AM
OFF TOPIC
I'm guessing people might have picked up on this by now, but just in case you haven't the world famous married goat from sudan died recently
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/6619983.stm
I'll leave you to imagine how!
Sorry
Andy
Posted by: Andy | May 04, 2007 at 01:52 AM
"I can only come to the conclusion that we don't have free will, but I'm perplexed why others can't see it the same way."
Posted by: skelman | May 03, 2007 at 02:54 PM"
That's because you're wrong.
Posted by: jeqp | May 04, 2007 at 01:35 AM
Hey Scott,
if you liked Spinoza & an his view on God, then you certainly will like the "The homunculus argument in the philosophy of mind":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homunculus#The_homunculus_argument_or_fallacy_in_the_philosophy_of_mind
That should show those free will weasels where the hammer hangs!
Posted by: Another one | May 04, 2007 at 01:35 AM
It's a good 'un
Posted by: naz | May 04, 2007 at 12:37 AM